{ "@context":[ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"} ], "published":"2025-01-02T13:31:33.961Z", "attributedTo":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted", "replies":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/qYELRG__Ak4/replies", "to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"], "cc":["https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted/followers"], "content":"

After I release a new version of ktistec, I build the server commit-by-commit to see which commits increase the server executable size and build time the most. I do this because I’ve learned that small implementation details (inlined code, small methods, using blocks) can have large impacts on these numbers.

Here's the output:

Commit         Size          Time\n======== ========== ======= ===== =======\n248850b1   36426264          10.3\n47268073   36425688  -0.00%  10.5  +1.60%\n344de272   36425688  +0.00%  10.8  +3.24%\nef561f52   36425944  +0.00%  10.8  -0.08%\n8ae2cbd4   36429128  +0.01%  10.8  -0.01%\n3e425f3b   36429128  +0.00%  10.8  +0.22%\n1487d903   36427704  -0.00%  11.0  +1.42%\n935c9ceb   36427016  -0.00%  11.0  +0.14%\nde37dc6a   36427016  +0.00%  10.9  -0.97%\na660a326   36427016  +0.00%  10.8  -1.12%\nff3d990e   36427016  +0.00%  10.8  +0.54%\n5724a58d   36523192  +0.26%  11.0  +1.78%\n7b5057d4   36523640  +0.00%  11.0  -0.44%\n30ca6a3f   36541352  +0.05%  11.6  +5.73%\ne2327eea   36671592  +0.36%  11.0  -5.36%\nad0d76eb   36671592  +0.00%  10.9  -0.48%\nd388e74f   36671592  +0.00%  11.4  +4.59%\ndacea7ad   36671592  +0.00%  11.0  -3.76%\n03d5dfd8   36671592  +0.00%  10.8  -1.63%\n79d9d89f   36671576  -0.00%  11.0  +1.82%\nb65d292f   36792376  +0.33%  11.1  +0.95%\n0ef53365   36808904  +0.04%  11.6  +4.88%\nb3766e7b   36808904  +0.00%  11.1  -4.50%\n56ba79ce   36825416  +0.04%  11.1  -0.50%\n4824df58   36825736  +0.00%  11.1  +0.31%\nc4705143   36837544  +0.03%  11.1  -0.03%\ne3d37ef7   36837768  +0.00%  11.5  +3.52%\n4509fa0d   36837768  +0.00%  11.0  -3.83%\n0ff9237b   36837768  +0.00%  11.0  -0.55%

Overall, the server executable size increased by about 1.1% and the build time increased by about 6.8%. Maybe that's not too bad for a major feature, but let's dig in.

It's nice to see that three commits account for almost all of the increase in server executable size:

But, compare 5724a58d to 8ae2cbd4 (Add `language` to `Account`). It added +22 loc but didn't increase the server executable size as much.

In any case, I'll look at e2327eea first. I'd like to understand why this relatively small change adds 130,240 bytes to the server executable size!

The follow ups are here and here and here.

#ktistec #crystallang

", "contentMap":{ "en-US":"

After I release a new version of ktistec, I build the server commit-by-commit to see which commits increase the server executable size and build time the most. I do this because I’ve learned that small implementation details (inlined code, small methods, using blocks) can have large impacts on these numbers.

Here's the output:

Commit         Size          Time\n======== ========== ======= ===== =======\n248850b1   36426264          10.3\n47268073   36425688  -0.00%  10.5  +1.60%\n344de272   36425688  +0.00%  10.8  +3.24%\nef561f52   36425944  +0.00%  10.8  -0.08%\n8ae2cbd4   36429128  +0.01%  10.8  -0.01%\n3e425f3b   36429128  +0.00%  10.8  +0.22%\n1487d903   36427704  -0.00%  11.0  +1.42%\n935c9ceb   36427016  -0.00%  11.0  +0.14%\nde37dc6a   36427016  +0.00%  10.9  -0.97%\na660a326   36427016  +0.00%  10.8  -1.12%\nff3d990e   36427016  +0.00%  10.8  +0.54%\n5724a58d   36523192  +0.26%  11.0  +1.78%\n7b5057d4   36523640  +0.00%  11.0  -0.44%\n30ca6a3f   36541352  +0.05%  11.6  +5.73%\ne2327eea   36671592  +0.36%  11.0  -5.36%\nad0d76eb   36671592  +0.00%  10.9  -0.48%\nd388e74f   36671592  +0.00%  11.4  +4.59%\ndacea7ad   36671592  +0.00%  11.0  -3.76%\n03d5dfd8   36671592  +0.00%  10.8  -1.63%\n79d9d89f   36671576  -0.00%  11.0  +1.82%\nb65d292f   36792376  +0.33%  11.1  +0.95%\n0ef53365   36808904  +0.04%  11.6  +4.88%\nb3766e7b   36808904  +0.00%  11.1  -4.50%\n56ba79ce   36825416  +0.04%  11.1  -0.50%\n4824df58   36825736  +0.00%  11.1  +0.31%\nc4705143   36837544  +0.03%  11.1  -0.03%\ne3d37ef7   36837768  +0.00%  11.5  +3.52%\n4509fa0d   36837768  +0.00%  11.0  -3.83%\n0ff9237b   36837768  +0.00%  11.0  -0.55%

Overall, the server executable size increased by about 1.1% and the build time increased by about 6.8%. Maybe that's not too bad for a major feature, but let's dig in.

It's nice to see that three commits account for almost all of the increase in server executable size:

But, compare 5724a58d to 8ae2cbd4 (Add `language` to `Account`). It added +22 loc but didn't increase the server executable size as much.

In any case, I'll look at e2327eea first. I'd like to understand why this relatively small change adds 130,240 bytes to the server executable size!

The follow ups are here and here and here.

#ktistec #crystallang

" }, "mediaType":"text/html", "attachment":[], "tag":[ {"type":"Hashtag","name":"#ktistec","href":"https://epiktistes.com/tags/ktistec"}, {"type":"Hashtag","name":"#crystallang","href":"https://epiktistes.com/tags/crystallang"} ], "url":["https://epiktistes.com/ktistec/performance/build-time-and-server-size-growth"], "type":"Note", "id":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/VUi_4Uh9vew" }