This action will delete this post on this instance and on all federated instances, and it cannot be undone. Are you certain you want to delete this post?
This action will delete this post on this instance and on all federated instances, and it cannot be undone. Are you certain you want to delete this post?
This action will block this actor and hide all of their past and future posts. Are you certain you want to block this actor?
This action will block this object. Are you certain you want to block this object?
The prologue to this post, and other posts in the series, is here.
Investigating commit b65d292f was fruitful but not for obvious reasons.
Dumping the symbols (nm -j server
) before and after the commit showed large number of new equality (==
) methods. From the diff:
1765a1772 > _*ActivityPub::Activity::Accept#==<Translation>:Bool 1920a1928 > _*ActivityPub::Activity::Add#==<Translation>:Bool 2062a2071 > _*ActivityPub::Activity::Announce#==<Translation>:Bool 2237a2247 > _*ActivityPub::Activity::Block#==<Translation>:Bool ...
The use, in a controller action, of the new Translation
model seemingly triggered their generation. What was going on?
A long time ago I implemented a MVC model framework in the style of ActiveRecord (2de4a4b3) and it included a method for testing for equality. Note the method signature.
# Returns true if all properties are equal. # def ==(other : self) {% begin %} {% vs = @type.instance_vars.select(&.annotation(Persistent)) %} if {% for v in vs %} self.{{v}} == other.{{v}} && {% end %} self.id == other.id true else false end {% end %} end
The Reference
class—the default parent for classes—defines two base implementations of this method: one that tests for identity (not equality), with the signature def ==(other : self)
, and another that returns false
, with the signature def ==(other)
. When I implemented my method, my assumption was: redefine the former for model classes and let the latter take care of everything else. This assumption was incorrect.
In circumstances that I still don't completely understand, the compiler will generate calls to the latter (the method that just returned false
) when it "should have" been calling the former, and comparisons failed when they should have succeeded. I "fixed this" with commit effeaa26 that removed the type restriction and explicitly handled the type check. Everything worked!
The problem is Crystal creates a version of this method for every possible model comparison, specialized by both self
and other
. Most of the time the type check fails and the method returns false
. But the rest of the code is still present.
The fix (re)adds a method specialization that returns false
and lets the compiler handle the type check.
# Returns `false`. # def ==(other) false end
Because this method just returns a constant value, the compiler gets rid of the method call, as well.
Interestingly, this change reduced the size of the Ktistec server executable by 4.0% when building without the --release
flag but only 0.2% when building with it, so optimization does a good job at cleaning this up even without the change.