{
  "@context":"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
  "type":"Collection",
  "id":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/boiEzXzMu-k/thread",
  "items":[
    {
  "@context":[
    "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
    {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"}
  ],
  "published":"2022-12-18T13:26:00.048Z",
  "attributedTo":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted",
  "to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"],
  "cc":["https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted/followers"],
  "content":"<p>(i should probably just <a href=\"https://github.com/toddsundsted/ktistec/issues/49\">add support for mastodon style polls</a> to ktistec...)</p><p>i have an informal poll for <a href=\"https://github.com/toddsundsted/ktistec\">ktistec</a> users. should we require (and use features from) the most recent versions of sqlite? how recent is too recent? if you're running ktistec, i'd love your point of view.</p><p>some background... sqlite is the most significant dependency in ktistec. to minimize problems for potential users, i intentionally stuck to features found in \"older\" versions of sqlite. as i write this, the current version of sqlite is 3.40.0.&nbsp; ktistec only depends on 3.11.0, which was released in 2016. that's very conservative.</p><p><a href=\"https://epiktistes.com/tags/ktistec\" class=\"hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#ktistec</a></p>",
  "mediaType":"text/html",
  "attachment":[],
  "tag":[
      {"type":"Hashtag","name":"#ktistec","href":"https://epiktistes.com/tags/ktistec"}
  ],
  "type":"Note",
  "id":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/boiEzXzMu-k"
}

,
    {
  "@context":[
    "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
    {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"}
  ],
  "published":"2022-12-18T13:35:16.000Z",
  "attributedTo":"https://sunny.garden/users/Thegreenman",
  "inReplyTo":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/boiEzXzMu-k",
  "replies":"https://sunny.garden/users/Thegreenman/statuses/109534938160148630/replies",
  "to":["https://sunny.garden/users/Thegreenman/followers"],
  "cc":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public","https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted"],
  "content":"<p><span class=\"h-card\"><a href=\"https://epiktistes.com/@toddsundsted\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>toddsundsted</span></a></span><br />While I&#39;m not a current user, I&#39;m interested...(and hoping for a Yunohost install version.) Maybe just go back   one previous version. Like 3.3xxx</p>",
  "attachment":[],
  "tag":[
      {"type":"Mention","name":"@toddsundsted@epiktistes.com","href":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted"}
  ],
  "url":["https://sunny.garden/@Thegreenman/109534938160148630"],
  "type":"Note",
  "id":"https://sunny.garden/users/Thegreenman/statuses/109534938160148630"
}

,
    {
  "@context":[
    "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
    {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"}
  ],
  "published":"2022-12-19T11:24:58.748Z",
  "attributedTo":"https://k.matthias.org/actors/relistan",
  "inReplyTo":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/boiEzXzMu-k",
  "to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public","https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted"],
  "cc":["https://k.matthias.org/actors/relistan/followers"],
  "content":"<p><a href=\"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted\" class=\"mention\" rel=\"tag\">@toddsundsted</a> I vote that newer is OK, especially given that at least Ubuntu 22.04 LTS is on 3.37 and Alpine 3.17 is on 3.40. Especially since it gets `RETURNING ...` from 3.35 :)</p>",
  "mediaType":"text/html",
  "attachment":[],
  "tag":[
      {"type":"Mention","name":"@toddsundsted@epiktistes.com","href":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted"}
  ],
  "type":"Note",
  "id":"https://k.matthias.org/objects/5QUALIyX3AA"
}


  ]
}