{
  "@context":[
    "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
    {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"}
  ],
  "published":"2023-11-28T15:03:06.034Z",
  "attributedTo":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted",
  "inReplyTo":"https://ruby.social/users/onghu/statuses/111488689665936051",
  "to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public","https://ruby.social/users/onghu"],
  "cc":["https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted/followers"],
  "content":"<p><a href=\"https://ruby.social/users/onghu\" class=\"mention\" rel=\"tag\">@onghu</a> thanks! yes, i haven't ruled out bugs somewhere else. running the query in the console does confirm it is scanning the table. on the other hand, the timing indicates a reasonable 6msec—not the 100+msec i'm seeing in the application...</p>",
  "mediaType":"text/html",
  "attachment":[],
  "tag":[
      {"type":"Mention","name":"@onghu@ruby.social","href":"https://ruby.social/users/onghu"}
  ],
  "type":"Note",
  "id":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/cjdrtjqBq3Y"
}