{ "@context":"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "type":"Collection", "id":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/o3YZgRbaFLc/thread", "items":[ { "@context":[ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"} ], "published":"2022-01-09T13:45:56.693Z", "attributedTo":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted", "to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"], "cc":["https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted/followers"], "content":"
i don't know about this decision:
It is suggested that LitePub implementations supply a locally hosted version of the LitePub JSON-LD Context as their @context.
what i see in practice (N > 100) is the same \"litepub-0.1.jsonld\" context but different URLs. all of these identical contexts have to be fetched, parsed, cached (hopefully).
it seems wasteful.
", "mediaType":"text/html", "attachment":[], "tag":[ {"type":"Hashtag","name":"#activitypub","href":"https://epiktistes.com/tags/activitypub"} ], "type":"Note", "id":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/o3YZgRbaFLc" } , { "@context":[ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"} ], "published":"2022-01-09T14:31:28.000Z", "attributedTo":"https://mastodon.social/users/Gargron", "inReplyTo":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/o3YZgRbaFLc", "replies":"https://mastodon.social/users/Gargron/statuses/107592986658987598/replies", "to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"], "cc":["https://mastodon.social/users/Gargron/followers","https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted"], "content":"@toddsundsted Agree
", "attachment":[], "tag":[ {"type":"Mention","name":"@toddsundsted@epiktistes.com","href":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted"} ], "url":["https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/107592986658987598"], "type":"Note", "id":"https://mastodon.social/users/Gargron/statuses/107592986658987598" } ] }