{
  "@context":[
    "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
    {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"}
  ],
  "published":"2023-07-26T17:26:40.126Z",
  "attributedTo":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted",
  "inReplyTo":"https://hackers.town/users/rafial/statuses/110781430623025990",
  "to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public","https://hackers.town/users/rafial"],
  "cc":["https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted/followers"],
  "content":"<p><a href=\"https://hackers.town/users/rafial\" class=\"mention\" rel=\"tag\">@rafial</a> that is my intuition as well. it seems like (and this is pretty loose reasoning) getting tricky syntax and types right is going to be hard to do well, and unless it's done well and consistently it's not very useful. whereas, i'm kind of okay with a summary of the code that isn't perfect or a few false positives flagging risky code.</p>",
  "mediaType":"text/html",
  "attachment":[],
  "tag":[
      {"type":"Mention","name":"@rafial@hackers.town","href":"https://hackers.town/users/rafial"}
  ],
  "type":"Note",
  "id":"https://epiktistes.com/objects/ydCSyokhiZ8"
}